reference · Technical analysis
Fair Value Gap: A Three-Candle Convention
A fair value gap is a practitioner label for a selected three-candle non-overlap pattern. It is not an accounting fair-value estimate, and the candles alone do not prove that a price area must be revisited.

Use an explicit chart rule
One common bullish convention checks whether the third candle's low is above the first candle's high, leaving a zone between those two prices around a strong middle candle. A bearish convention reverses the comparison. LuxAlgo documents its fair-value-gap terminology; this is a primary description of an indicator convention, not independent evidence of profitable prediction.
Some implementations require a minimum gap, a directional middle candle or a volatility filter. Others use body boundaries or higher-timeframe observations. State the variant before comparing examples. The same phrase does not guarantee identical detection rules across scripts.
An original bullish example
Assume three completed candles have the following relevant extremes: candle one high 100; candle two ranges from 99 to 106; candle three low 103. Under the stated wick-based convention, the highlighted zone runs from 100 to 103 because the first and third candles do not overlap there.
The middle candle's high-low range spans that zone, but its OHLC summary does not reveal which intervening prices actually traded. The pattern therefore establishes neither an absence of transactions between 100 and 103 nor continuous trading through every price there. It also does not identify quantity at each price or participants' remaining positions.
If a later candle falls to 102, it enters the zone without traversing it completely. If it reaches 100, it covers the full illustrated interval. A script may call the first event a mitigation, while another waits for a midpoint or full traversal. LuxAlgo explicitly exposes alternative mitigation methods. Define that event before reporting how often gaps were filled.
Fair value is a label, not a valuation
This chart convention does not calculate discounted cash flows, an exchange settlement value or a consensus estimate of an asset's intrinsic worth. It cannot establish that institutions have unfilled orders in the highlighted zone. Claims about those orders require data the three-candle pattern does not contain.
A zone can remain untouched, be crossed without reversal, or be affected by a price gap that provides no usable entry. A visually precise rectangle does not identify a valid stop, a guaranteed fill or a favorable expected payoff.
Test detection and outcome separately
Record every eligible completed three-candle sequence, the detection time, zone boundaries, minimum-size rule and expiration horizon. Keep untouched zones and failures. A percentage of zones eventually revisited is uninterpretable without a defined horizon and does not equal the success rate of a trading strategy.
Compare order-block conventions and what OHLC can actually establish. Use an unseen sample before turning a chosen interpretation into a rule. The defensible statement is that specified candles meet a declared pattern condition; future price behavior remains uncertain.
Questions and answers
Does every fair value gap have to fill?
No. A revisit is not guaranteed. Any measured fill rate needs a stated gap definition, observation horizon and complete sample.
Does a fair value gap prove unfilled institutional orders?
No. Three-candle OHLC data does not identify participants, resting orders or their remaining inventory.
Sources and further checks
Use the current source for your exact instrument, account and platform. Referencing a general specification does not establish support for every TradeCopier workflow.
- LuxAlgo: Fair Value Gap implementation convention · Checked September 19, 2026
- LuxAlgo: Imbalance detection and mitigation settings · Checked September 19, 2026
Found an error? Send a correction with this page's address and a primary source. See our editorial standards for how we handle examples, claims and revisions.

